May 7, 2007 (Computerworld) --
We’ve all heard IT professionals imagine how secure their networks would be if they just didn’t have to use any Microsoft products.
I’ve had to listen to clients kvetch for hours on end about how Microsoft makes their lives miserable and how everything would be better in a Microsoft-free world. Tony Bove wrote a whole book with that theme, Just Say No to Microsoft, and plenty of blogs have taken up the cry.
It’s time for all the people who have entertained this fantasy to stop deluding themselves.
How would life without Microsoft be different? It wouldn’t be in any meaningful way for those in charge of network security; there would just be a different vendor peddling the dominant operating system.
Networks in a world in which Apple had won the operating systems wars would still be insecure. What’s that, you say? The Macintosh has had far fewer bugs reported and patched than Windows? That’s true, but it’s a consequence of the minuscule market penetration of Mac OS. If the Mac had enjoyed a market share of upwards of 80 percent for the past couple of decades, it would have been the focus of every hacker and script kiddie on the planet. And you might be lamenting the minuscule market share of that scrappy operating system vendor in Redmond, Wash.
If you put computers on a network and open that network to the outside world via the Internet, you’re going to have security problems, regardless of whether you’re running Windows, Mac OS, Linux or an operating system you created in your spare time. By all means, we need to run the safest operating system we can, fortify our networks and police the whole thing. But once we’ve done all that, we’re left with one unalterable fact: Users will still make errors galore. Training can help. But for a bit of perspective, consider commercial air transportation. The hardware is about as safe as possible, and pilots are trained as thoroughly as surgeons. But accidents happen, and they’re usually the result of pilot error.
User errors have long been the bane of security. In a sense, true security requires a paranoia honed to a fanatical edge, but sometimes even fanaticism isn’t enough. After all, no one has surpassed the Nazis when it comes to fanatical paranoia. Yet even the well-trained German soldiers of World War II broke a fundamental rule of cryptography and reused the same keys. That mistake might be the only reason this article wasn’t written in German.
So, what needs to be done? You must require users to attend formal information security training and awareness programs. No one should be left out. Set minimum security training and awareness requirements that all workers must meet -- even janitors and others who have no system access. Step up the requirements for those who have access to corporate information systems (most workers would fall into this category), and establish exhaustive requirements for employees in computer-related positions of trust, such as security staff and systems programmers.
Continued...
1 |
2 |
NEXT

Can you erase your tracks online? We tried to get a few bad mentions off the Net forever. Here's how we did.
We've got an array of economical, expensive, and just plain weird tech gifts for your friends and family.
BlackBerry's Storm may be an iPhone wannabe, but it's a powerful smart phone that will be particularly attractive to business users.
Nvidia's Tesla Personal Supercomputer sports 960 cores, delivers almost 4 teraflops of performance and costs less than $9,995.
Get the latest news, reviews and more about Microsoft's newest desktop operating system
Find wage data for 50 IT job titles.
|
 |
| Moving to Windows Vista: The Promise, The Reality Moving to Windows Vista: The Promise, The Reality View this exclusive webcast today! Go to the webcast |
|
| Computerworld Executive Bulletin: Building a Robust Antivirus Defense Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs. (Source: MessageLabs) Antivirus software alone isn't enough to prevent today's speedy, sophisticated virus attacks. Security managers should consider multitiered approaches that include behavior scanning, appliances that check e-mail for worms, and restricting user access to dangerous Web sites. Download this Executive Bulletin (a $49.95 value) for free, compliments of MessageLabs, to learn more. Download this executive briefing |
|
| Record Capacity for Microsoft? Exchange 2007 With VMware and IBM System x3850 M2 Download this white paper today! (Source: VMware) The more that e-mail becomes an entrenched IT infrastructure application, the more that messaging administrators face numerous--sometimes conflicting--demands in the categories of availability, flexibility and cost. Employing a virtual solution can help avoid expensive over-provisioning of server computing resources, while improving management and disaster recovery. And ultimately, it can more than double the number of supportable Exchange 2007 users, as compared to a non-virtualized environment. This whitepaper explains how to break down the scalability barrier and respond faster to your mail system needs. Download this white paper |
|
| White Papers Read up on the latest ideas and technologies from companies that sell hardware, software and services. | View more whitepapers |
|
|